Compare and contrast social hierarchies of china an india

A comparison of economic development in China and India

Cultures were tolerated as long as they obeyed the rules of the caliphate, and payed a special tax and did not revolt. They used conscripted labor to build irrigation systems, which led to increase in agricultural output. For instance, both Imperial Rome and the Indian empires heavily participated in trade due to the existence of the Silk Roads linking much of Europe and Asia.

Both countries should concentrate on the importation of advanced technologies and managerial experience, and eventually reduce their dependency on foreign investments and promote internal growth based on domestic consumption and government investments.

Still, the Chinese government has for some time begun investing massively to promote the development in interior areas through the construction of infrastructure, promoting urbanization and through the relocation of parts of the population into areas less densely populated.

Long-distance trade continued to grow throughout the period, although there were temporary interruptions due to the bubonic plague. Conversely India, with a PIL growth of 7. Tang rulers set up military garrisons to protect the Silk Road Trade.

A soul may move up and down the ladder toward unity with Brahman depending on one's deeds and sincerity towards faith during a lifetime. Both Buddhism and Christianity gained more followers outside their place of origin.

However, when taking into account indications of government efficiency and quality of legislation, China has better results than India. Both civilizations had organized governments, social classes, and religions, but they had distincly different government structures and religions.

Mosques, hospitals, schools and orphanages were set up throughout the empire, which allowed for the spread of intellectual ideas such as algebra, Greek learning, and latitude and longitude. The reforms began with the dismantling of the communal systems in the countryside, moving on to the liberating of prices, to fiscal decentralization, to greater autonomy of state companies, to the development of the private sector, to the development of a financial market and to a modern banking system, up to the opening of business abroad and the Direct Foreign Investments IDE.

While some Indian people were looking to reach nirvana in Buddhism, the Romans were praying to several different gods due to Greek influence. The Indian caste system based on skin color created the idea of racial division by placing the lighter skinned people in higher classes and the darker skinned people in lower classes.

These shared beliefs also influenced and reinforced political, economic, and occupational stratification. Women - Marriages were arranged within their social classes. We will analyze the PIL growth rate, the infrastructure, the level of foreign investments attracted IDEthe total volume of imports and exports, as well as the national savings rate.

Both Rome and India had social classes, although the caste system of India was more distinct and unchanging. Tang policies also influenced the spread of Buddhism, but saw a backlash toward the end of the dynasty because Buddhism was seen as a foreign religion.

Aztec Empire Around - - The Mexica were the last great Mesoamerican culture prior to the arrival of the Europeans. Religions and belief systems provided a bond among the people and an ethical code to live by.

India enjoys an advantage compared to China in terms of economic reliability and fairness, as well a a greater efficiency in fighting corruption and an administration that observes the laws. These unskilled people were not slaves, but they were given jobs that the rest of the population did not prefer.

Imperial Rome, on the other hand, was ruled by an empire and a senate. Their economy was agricultural based, and they used cacao beans as currency.

China and India - 13 charts that show how the countries compare

Its central location on the Mediterranean Sea allowed trade to flourish, especially in the capital of Constantinople. The government was controlled by one emperor, and society was organized by the rigid caste system. Remains of the aqueducts still exist in many European locations such as Nimes and Arles in France, as well as Rome.

Roman government took steps to appease the unhappy lower class by giving them a say in the senate as well as tribunes which originated during the Roman republic.

The reforms concentrated on three main aspects: All living things participated in the caste system. The situation in China Since the beginning of the Chinese economic reform launched by Deng Xiaoping inChina has passed from a closed, centralized economic system to a market economy.

InZheng He's expeditions were ended and his records destroyed. Nevertheless, following the opening of foreign investments and the reforms promoted during the Seventies, the Chinese economy recorded enormous progress and has surpassed the Indian economy in every category.

Women could inherit property in the absence of male heirs. Emperor Justinian attempted to reconquer the western portion, but failed. Nevertheless, when China and India are more closely and meticulously compared, the profound difference in development between the dragon and the elephant is immediately noticeable, with the former having a decisive advantage over the latter.Imperial Rome and Mauryan/Guptan India both began their classical periods before the common era and stretched nearly five centuries into the common era.

Both civilizations had organized governments, social classes, and religions, but they had distincly different government structures and religions. Compare and contrast the social hierarchies of China and India.

Be sure to discuss 2 similarities and 2 differences between China's social system and India's social system. Both social hierarchies had "groups" of people that move people up and down. The social structures of empires displayed hierarchies that included cultivators, laborers, slaves, artisans, merchants, elites, or caste groups.

C. Imperial societies relied on a range of methods (Corvee, Slavery, Rents and tributes, Peasant communities, Family and household production) to maintain the production of food and provide rewards. In both India and Rome, the social hierarchies used the underclass for cheap labor, they both had a defined upper class, and relied on the underclass to do their work for them.

Also, both of their social systems both grew out of the interaction between culturally different people. social hierarchy, language and religion to gain and have political control. Even though both empires were around at different time periods such as Han China ( B.C.E C.E) and Gupta India ( B.C.E C.E), both empires shared similar beliefs and traditions for the better of.

Classical China and Classical India were truly great civilizations known for their contributions to modern China and India. Yet as the two developed, they showed uniqueness. Some of the qualities shown were alike, and others were not as comparable.

Compare and contrast social hierarchies of china an india
Rated 3/5 based on 43 review